Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nicjansma"

(→‎Layout: hairline)
(→‎Layout: to -> the)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
:I for one don't like the new layout, because it makes the headings as big as the title, which just looks wrong to me. Additionally, Wikipedia uses the two == layout and it works quite well. That's just my opinion; we need more people to chime in. -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 20:06, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
 
:I for one don't like the new layout, because it makes the headings as big as the title, which just looks wrong to me. Additionally, Wikipedia uses the two == layout and it works quite well. That's just my opinion; we need more people to chime in. -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 20:06, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
 
::There is no problem, we can change the headings size for the new layout, but a admin must do this, oh Bob the arcticle name size and the new heading size is the same, or iam wrong? I think not.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 20:32, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
 
::There is no problem, we can change the headings size for the new layout, but a admin must do this, oh Bob the arcticle name size and the new heading size is the same, or iam wrong? I think not.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 20:32, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
:::If you look on Wikipedia, you'll see that section headings have a hairline that covers the width of the page. I do think it makes to article more readable. Any thoughts on adopting this here? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] ([[User talk:Scaletail|talk]]) 20:09, 30 October 2013 (PDT)
+
:::If you look on Wikipedia, you'll see that section headings have a hairline that covers the width of the page. I do think it makes the article more readable. Any thoughts on adopting this here? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] ([[User talk:Scaletail|talk]]) 20:09, 30 October 2013 (PDT)

Revision as of 23:09, 30 October 2013

Archive

Talk Archives:

Current

Broken Link

I noticed that the MUX link on the left navigation bar is broken and links to a deleted page, so the link on the side should also be removed. -BobTheZombie (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2013 (PDT)

  • I hope to create a small page that talks about the old-school (and current) MUX/MUSEs soon. Nicjansma (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2013 (PDT)

Sarna.net Design Refresh

August 20, 2013: The new visuals are live for all of Sarna. Please let me know if you have any feedback. There's additional talk about the refresh in the 2013 Archive.Nicjansma (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2013 (PDT)

Layout

Hy Nic i copyied this talk from Mbears talk page, please give us a statement about the new layout on the various Combat Vehicle pages, if it works or not or ideas.

Hi Mbear, can you take a look on the Heimdall (Combat Vehicle) page i changed the headers a little bit, my feeling is it looks much better and has a cleaner overview as our standard formating, what do you think? Ok iam be bold the new layout looks great, if it not become acceptance i revert me changes.--Doneve (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2013 (PDT)

I for one don't like the new layout, because it makes the headings as big as the title, which just looks wrong to me. Additionally, Wikipedia uses the two == layout and it works quite well. That's just my opinion; we need more people to chime in. -BobTheZombie (talk) 20:06, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
There is no problem, we can change the headings size for the new layout, but a admin must do this, oh Bob the arcticle name size and the new heading size is the same, or iam wrong? I think not.--Doneve (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
If you look on Wikipedia, you'll see that section headings have a hairline that covers the width of the page. I do think it makes the article more readable. Any thoughts on adopting this here? --Scaletail (talk) 20:09, 30 October 2013 (PDT)