Template:Done
Sarna News
Done
Template documentationThis template is often used on Talk pages to show clearly that a section of discussion has been resolved, so that each editor does not have to re-read the section.
Contents
Usage
You may either use {{done}} by itself for the default message or you may customize with optional parameters.
| Parameters | Code example | Result |
|---|---|---|
| none | {{done}} |
Done
|
1st parameter (unnamed or named 1) for a custom message |
{{done|Implemented}} |
Implemented
|
1st parameter (unnamed or named 1) for a linked custom message |
{{done|1=[[BattleTechWiki:Templates for discussion|Implemented]]}} |
Implemented
|
if only 2nd parameter is needed (to give a reason), it has to be named 2 or reason or note |
{{done|reason=after consensus.}} |
Done: after consensus.
|
| if 1st and 2nd parameter are combined, both can be unnamed | {{done|Implemented|after consensus.}} |
Implemented: after consensus.
|
Example
|
I think the article is biased in favour of the school. --John
|
TemplateData
{ "description": "This template adds a green tick mark with text and is often used on talk pages to show clearly that a section of discussion has been resolved, so that each editor does not have to re-read the section.", "params": { "1": { "label": "Custom message", "type": "content", "default": "Done", "description": "Enter an individual message to replace the default 'Done' text." },
"2": {
"label": "Reason",
"aliases": [ "reason", "note" ],
"type": "content",
"description": "Text to follow the text 'Done'"
}
} }
See also
 | This Template page is not yet active, as it concerns an administrative page that is a draft or a draft proposal and is located here. Editors are requested to be bold and assist with the drafting process if possible. Likewise, editors can comment on the pros and cons of the basic idea and on how the draft can be improved, rather than on whether it is a good idea to adopt the draft in its current form. Once this notice is removed (and the page moved out of the to its correct spot), discussion can move more clearly on to the issue of whether an actual proposal should be adopted, with or without amendments. |