Difference between revisions of "Talk:Super Wasp"
Sarna News
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==XTRO Conundrum== | ==XTRO Conundrum== | ||
So, I asked the writers and got an answer from herb concerning the Super wasp and griffin. Essentially any of the old material is not valid anymore as far as design specs. With this in mind, do we want to have anything in the primary articles concerning this as I dont think design information from any previous supplement would be valid per this post on CBTs forum: | So, I asked the writers and got an answer from herb concerning the Super wasp and griffin. Essentially any of the old material is not valid anymore as far as design specs. With this in mind, do we want to have anything in the primary articles concerning this as I dont think design information from any previous supplement would be valid per this post on CBTs forum: | ||
Latest revision as of 19:29, 17 October 2023
XTRO Conundrum[edit]
So, I asked the writers and got an answer from herb concerning the Super wasp and griffin. Essentially any of the old material is not valid anymore as far as design specs. With this in mind, do we want to have anything in the primary articles concerning this as I dont think design information from any previous supplement would be valid per this post on CBTs forum: http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,26003.msg587358.html#msg587358 ThanksCJ (talk) 10:15, 22 January 2013 (PST)
The Super Wasp was based off the Wasp as it appeared in Battledroids, where that design was one ton too heavy. This is the mostly likely where the error came from. The creators adjusted the weights of the Wasp to create the new mech, but never caught that the armor value was wrong.Ssyrie 06:54, 22 June 2009 (PDT)