Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naval Laser 35"
Sarna News
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Hey Villagereaver, as the wiki is becoming more lore orientated (we realised that rules can get us in trouble with copyright laws) it likely make sense to have them.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 17:46, 2 March 2024 (EST) | :Hey Villagereaver, as the wiki is becoming more lore orientated (we realised that rules can get us in trouble with copyright laws) it likely make sense to have them.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 17:46, 2 March 2024 (EST) | ||
| − | I wasn't clear. Capital ranges are in multiple kilometres and not compatible with battlefield ranges. I was asking about listing appropriate ranges, some might even say "lore friendly" ranges. | + | I wasn't clear. Capital ranges are in multiple kilometres and not compatible with battlefield ranges. I was asking about listing appropriate ranges, some might even say "lore friendly" ranges. If I were building a several hundred ton space based weapon system, I'd like a range of more than a few metres. |
Latest revision as of 12:31, 15 March 2024
Capital Ranges[edit]
Since capital ranges are different than battlefield, should the ranges in metres be removed?
If ranges in metres (km) are desired, I'll happily add them to capital weapons. ~David— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by Villagereaver (talk • contribs) .
- Hey Villagereaver, as the wiki is becoming more lore orientated (we realised that rules can get us in trouble with copyright laws) it likely make sense to have them.--Dmon (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2024 (EST)
I wasn't clear. Capital ranges are in multiple kilometres and not compatible with battlefield ranges. I was asking about listing appropriate ranges, some might even say "lore friendly" ranges. If I were building a several hundred ton space based weapon system, I'd like a range of more than a few metres.