Editing Talk:BattleTech (Video Game)
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 26:
Line 26: HBS have announced that they are adding roughly 50 new systems to the game in Update 1.6 by moving the top edge of the in game map "north" pushing deeper into the Inner Sphere. This move is not entierly unexpected but it does raise some questions on how we should handle the list of worlds featured in the game as it could eventually be half of the Sphere.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 04:42, 13 May 2019 (EDT) HBS have announced that they are adding roughly 50 new systems to the game in Update 1.6 by moving the top edge of the in game map "north" pushing deeper into the Inner Sphere. This move is not entierly unexpected but it does raise some questions on how we should handle the list of worlds featured in the game as it could eventually be half of the Sphere.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 04:42, 13 May 2019 (EDT) :At some arbitrary point, I reckon the list of worlds is so big that it isn't meaningful anymore. My personal main concern is wether HBS will add new worlds, new information for existing worlds, and/or include more anachronisms and "problematic" data. Maybe we'll end up with a list of system/planetary data where HBS diverge from mainline CGL canon. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:54, 13 May 2019 (EDT) :At some arbitrary point, I reckon the list of worlds is so big that it isn't meaningful anymore. My personal main concern is wether HBS will add new worlds, new information for existing worlds, and/or include more anachronisms and "problematic" data. Maybe we'll end up with a list of system/planetary data where HBS diverge from mainline CGL canon. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:54, 13 May 2019 (EDT) − ::I have finally had the time to sit down and cross-reference the map in the UW pre-view video, the current in game map and believe that the map will be increasing both "north" and to the "west". On the Fed Suns end it has moved up from [[Lindsay]] to the [[Pleiades Cluster]] and looks to be all canon planets. FWL end I am struggling to pin down specifics but it might extend as far West" as [[Vakarel]] and "north" as [[Andurien]]. − ::My first instinct is to split off the planets into [[BattleTech (Video Game)/Planets|Planets in BattleTech Video Game]] the same way I have done with the 'Mechs in order to prevent VG data making its way into the mainline 'Mech articles but unlike the 'Mech articles a good few of the planet articles in question are essentially blank slates and could do with some content. new information is both good and bad for the planets project.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 20:15, 15 May 2019 (EDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
HBS have announced that they are adding roughly 50 new systems to the game in Update 1.6 by moving the top edge of the in game map "north" pushing deeper into the Inner Sphere. This move is not entierly unexpected but it does raise some questions on how we should handle the list of worlds featured in the game as it could eventually be half of the Sphere.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 04:42, 13 May 2019 (EDT) | HBS have announced that they are adding roughly 50 new systems to the game in Update 1.6 by moving the top edge of the in game map "north" pushing deeper into the Inner Sphere. This move is not entierly unexpected but it does raise some questions on how we should handle the list of worlds featured in the game as it could eventually be half of the Sphere.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 04:42, 13 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
:At some arbitrary point, I reckon the list of worlds is so big that it isn't meaningful anymore. My personal main concern is wether HBS will add new worlds, new information for existing worlds, and/or include more anachronisms and "problematic" data. Maybe we'll end up with a list of system/planetary data where HBS diverge from mainline CGL canon. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:54, 13 May 2019 (EDT) | :At some arbitrary point, I reckon the list of worlds is so big that it isn't meaningful anymore. My personal main concern is wether HBS will add new worlds, new information for existing worlds, and/or include more anachronisms and "problematic" data. Maybe we'll end up with a list of system/planetary data where HBS diverge from mainline CGL canon. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:54, 13 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||