Difference between revisions of "Talk:AgroMech (Achernar IndustrialMechs)"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{WikiProject BattleMechs| | + | {{WikiProject BattleMechs|}} |
==Revert== | ==Revert== | ||
I see no reason to switch the '''B''' around, as the B version is clearly a single 'Mech, while the plain MOD was a series. Plus, the IP Editor did not provide a citation for the change nor a reason why it should differ. IOW, the change was unsupported by the facts.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | I see no reason to switch the '''B''' around, as the B version is clearly a single 'Mech, while the plain MOD was a series. Plus, the IP Editor did not provide a citation for the change nor a reason why it should differ. IOW, the change was unsupported by the facts.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This shouldn't be listed under "BattleMechs." It's an IndustrialMech, says so right in the name.[[User:ReinhardtSteiner|ReinhardtSteiner]] ([[User talk:ReinhardtSteiner|talk]]) | This shouldn't be listed under "BattleMechs." It's an IndustrialMech, says so right in the name.[[User:ReinhardtSteiner|ReinhardtSteiner]] ([[User talk:ReinhardtSteiner|talk]]) | ||
:It is listed under '''Light BattleMechs''' and '''35 ton BattleMechs''' because they are a standard catch-all for the weight classes, we could probably stand to shorted the term to ''''Mechs''' and keep it as a catch-all. The '''Inner Sphere BattleMechs''' however I agree is blatantly incorrect.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 03:56, 1 May 2021 (EDT) | :It is listed under '''Light BattleMechs''' and '''35 ton BattleMechs''' because they are a standard catch-all for the weight classes, we could probably stand to shorted the term to ''''Mechs''' and keep it as a catch-all. The '''Inner Sphere BattleMechs''' however I agree is blatantly incorrect.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 03:56, 1 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Merge with Harvester== | ||
+ | I suggest merging this article with the [[Harvester]] article. Unless I am mistaken, these AgroMechs are one in the same.--[[User:Cache|Cache]] ([[User talk:Cache|talk]]) 18:52, 20 August 2021 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Note== | ||
+ | Reviewed, already merged with harvester. [[User:CJKeys|CJ]] ([[User talk:CJKeys|talk]]) 05:09, 10 February 2022 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 06:09, 10 February 2022
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Contents
Revert[edit]
I see no reason to switch the B around, as the B version is clearly a single 'Mech, while the plain MOD was a series. Plus, the IP Editor did not provide a citation for the change nor a reason why it should differ. IOW, the change was unsupported by the facts.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Category[edit]
This shouldn't be listed under "BattleMechs." It's an IndustrialMech, says so right in the name.ReinhardtSteiner (talk)
- It is listed under Light BattleMechs and 35 ton BattleMechs because they are a standard catch-all for the weight classes, we could probably stand to shorted the term to 'Mechs and keep it as a catch-all. The Inner Sphere BattleMechs however I agree is blatantly incorrect.--Dmon (talk) 03:56, 1 May 2021 (EDT)
Merge with Harvester[edit]
I suggest merging this article with the Harvester article. Unless I am mistaken, these AgroMechs are one in the same.--Cache (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2021 (EDT)
Note[edit]
Reviewed, already merged with harvester. CJ (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2022 (EST)