Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Nagelring Alumni"
Sarna News
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deletion== | ==Deletion== | ||
I am not happy with this category in principle, I believe it sets a precedent for needless category bloat. This could be better served with a "notable alumni" section in each academy article.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 08:25, 28 April 2023 (EDT) | I am not happy with this category in principle, I believe it sets a precedent for needless category bloat. This could be better served with a "notable alumni" section in each academy article.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 08:25, 28 April 2023 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most of them only have a few notable alumni, to the point where you can count them on one hand. So usually that would work. This isn't the case for the Nagelring, NAIS and Sun Zhang, though.--[[User:ReinhardtSteiner|ReinhardtSteiner]] ([[User talk:ReinhardtSteiner|talk]]) 13:04, 28 April 2023 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:04, 28 April 2023
Deletion
I am not happy with this category in principle, I believe it sets a precedent for needless category bloat. This could be better served with a "notable alumni" section in each academy article.--Dmon (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
Most of them only have a few notable alumni, to the point where you can count them on one hand. So usually that would work. This isn't the case for the Nagelring, NAIS and Sun Zhang, though.--ReinhardtSteiner (talk) 13:04, 28 April 2023 (EDT)