Difference between revisions of "Category talk:JumpShips"
Sarna News
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Me either. Categories seems to be the thing to do. [[User:Communibus locis|Locis]] 11:49, 16 November 2008 (PST) | :Me either. Categories seems to be the thing to do. [[User:Communibus locis|Locis]] 11:49, 16 November 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Yes sounds good. But for breaking down in subcategories I would go for a break down into class NOT faction(Like we saw/see it for "Notable Pilots" it in the TRs). --[[User:BigDuke66|BigDuke66]] 17:06, 11 December 2008 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:06, 11 December 2008
Individual JumpShips[edit]
With the articles that are being created for individual ships, we need one or more new categories to handle them. For now, I propose creating "Category:Individual JumpShips" and "Category:Individual WarShips". There might come a time when we save so many that we need to break it down into subcategories, possibly by faction, but we're not at that stage yet. Are there any alternative ideas? --Scaletail 11:26, 15 November 2008 (PST)
- Sounds good. Nothing to add, really. Frabby 09:09, 16 November 2008 (PST)
- Me either. Categories seems to be the thing to do. Locis 11:49, 16 November 2008 (PST)
- Yes sounds good. But for breaking down in subcategories I would go for a break down into class NOT faction(Like we saw/see it for "Notable Pilots" it in the TRs). --BigDuke66 17:06, 11 December 2008 (PST)