Editing Category talk:Advanced Rules

==Central Category for Game Related subjects==

Hi there, I've found there alot Battletech related items which is directly related to the game play itself that have no central mother category.  This would related to standard game rules articles, lists such as this one of advance rules unique found in Tactical Operations, including artillery, weather conditions so forth. Then you have older rules, that would fall into obsolete rules. If should a central category be made, what should it be called?  I was going make them, but this major thing. Never mind it being bold.  Battletech Game Rules?  Game Rules? Tournament Game Rules.  Any thoughts? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 17:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
:[[:Category:Game_Aids]]. It's also listed on the [[Main Page]], in the 'Other Items of Note' section. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
::Games Aids?  That rather odd name...no wonder i could find it.  I go link this to Game Aids. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 19:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

:::Agree. There was some reason for that, I think stemming from the idea that we don't want to imply we have (or will have) all of BT's rules here, but simply articles and/or tables that may assist someone looking for an answer on something specific. Can you just imagine if we tried to re-create all of the rules, for each aspect of the game?!--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

::::Well, i don't want think about re-creating them.  Only thing i do think that the Game Aids isn't something someone going able connect the dots too if their looking for something regarding Battletech Rules.  The main category should be changed to something straight forward like Battletech Rules or Game Rules, then branch it from there. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 01:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

:::::Sure: mother category 'BattleTech Rules' with child cats based on the game: Classic, Role-Playing, Strategic, Aerospace, etc. The cat names (IMO) should not conform to the latest iteration of the games (ex: MechWarrior, A Time of War), because time has shown those change. But RPG, Classic (or maybe Tabletop), Strategic, would all encompass the various games. What do you think?--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 05:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::::Sure: mother category 'BattleTech Rules' with child cats based on the game: Classic, Role-Playing, Strategic, Aerospace, etc. The cat names (IMO) should not conform to the latest iteration of the games (ex: MechWarrior, A Time of War), because time has shown those change. But RPG, Classic (or maybe Tabletop), Strategic, would all encompass the various games. What do you think?--[[User:Revanche\|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche\|contribs]])</sup> 05:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)		:::::Sure: mother category 'BattleTech Rules' with child cats based on the game: Classic, Role-Playing, Strategic, Aerospace, etc. The cat names (IMO) should not conform to the latest iteration of the games (ex: MechWarrior, A Time of War), because time has shown those change. But RPG, Classic (or maybe Tabletop), Strategic, would all encompass the various games. What do you think?--[[User:Revanche\|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche\|contribs]])</sup> 05:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
−
−	:::::::Sounds like we have a winner. That alot better way to organize the current game/rules so forth. Battletech Rules sounds like best way naming it. Battletech Game Rules, maybe bit-too wordy? Let me know if you want me to proceed. -- [[User:Wrangler\|Wrangler]] 12:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)