Difference between revisions of "Talk:Space Station"
(Agree) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't find it really makes sense to have articles titled "Space Station" and "Space stations" at the same time. Shouldn't these be merged? - [[User:LogicBomb|LogicBomb]] 13:52, 19 February 2008 (CST) | I don't find it really makes sense to have articles titled "Space Station" and "Space stations" at the same time. Shouldn't these be merged? - [[User:LogicBomb|LogicBomb]] 13:52, 19 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:I agree. The only issue is do we keep the plural, or the singular? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 15:55, 19 February 2008 (CST) | :I agree. The only issue is do we keep the plural, or the singular? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 15:55, 19 February 2008 (CST) | ||
+ | :I also agree. And I suggest using the singular for the article because I feel this is the "basic" form. The item at hand is not a plural concept. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 16:18, 19 February 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:18, 19 February 2008
Note
This entry's description was quoted from Total Warfare and needs to be paraphrased or replaced. Any help in doing so would be greatly appreciated. --Revanche (admin) 20:35, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
Merging With "Space Stations" or vice-versa
I don't find it really makes sense to have articles titled "Space Station" and "Space stations" at the same time. Shouldn't these be merged? - LogicBomb 13:52, 19 February 2008 (CST)