Difference between revisions of "User talk:Anonymous ONI agent"
(→Properties: new section) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
So before I jump on things and kill them, what is your thinking on the use of Current rules?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 03:55, 13 March 2022 (EDT) | So before I jump on things and kill them, what is your thinking on the use of Current rules?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 03:55, 13 March 2022 (EDT) | ||
+ | :As for Property:Current Rules, if I'm being honest, I didn't even think about how it would have to be periodically updated to remain accurate. With that in mind, I definitely agree that it'd probably be more trouble than it's worth. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As for the BV properties, I was going to argue in favor of these initially, but after thinking about it, I can again see where you are coming from as we would either need to find a way to assign it to every single variant of every single unit which would be a huge pain, or be forced to settle for only using it on the main variants, which would be kinda pointless. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You can go ahead and nuke those. '''[[User:Anonymous ONI agent|»Anonymous ONI agent«]] <sup>[[User talk:Anonymous ONI agent|[COMMS]]] [[Special:Contributions/Anonymous ONI agent|[SERVICE RECORD]]]</sup> 05:30, 13 March 2022 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:31, 13 March 2022
Welcome
-- New user message (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2022 (EST)
Your First Award
Hey! I know I haven't been chatting as much about it on Discord, because Coding is not my forte on here. But I really like what you have done with the infobox, it looks like you are definitely on the right track!
I hereby present you with your first Award on this wiki:
The "All Purpose Award", which any Editor may give to any other for any stated reason. You can find the Awards Display code in BattleTechWiki:Awards. Keep up the good work!
--Talvin (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2022 (EST)
- Thank you! »Anonymous ONI agent« [COMMS] [SERVICE RECORD] 22:12, 7 March 2022 (EST)
Properties
Hey Anonymous ONI agent,
I have just seen you working on the Properties, now I am not entierly sure what they do as the only explanation I have been given was in the form of a link that was essentially written for somebody who writes code. BUT as far as I know the properties are something to do with automating the info boxes. That being the case... Property:BV 1.0, Property:BV 2.0 and possibly Property:Current Rules are things that I am going to push back on hard. BV 1 and 2 are better served by the MUL and Current Rules is something that can change over time.
So before I jump on things and kill them, what is your thinking on the use of Current rules?--Dmon (talk) 03:55, 13 March 2022 (EDT)
- As for Property:Current Rules, if I'm being honest, I didn't even think about how it would have to be periodically updated to remain accurate. With that in mind, I definitely agree that it'd probably be more trouble than it's worth.
As for the BV properties, I was going to argue in favor of these initially, but after thinking about it, I can again see where you are coming from as we would either need to find a way to assign it to every single variant of every single unit which would be a huge pain, or be forced to settle for only using it on the main variants, which would be kinda pointless.
You can go ahead and nuke those. »Anonymous ONI agent« [COMMS] [SERVICE RECORD] 05:30, 13 March 2022 (EDT)