User talk:Wrangler

Archives

User Talk Archive 2009 User Talk Archive 2010 User Talk Archive 2011 User Talk Archive 2012-2013 User Talk Archive 2014

Resources Pages

• User talk:Wrangler/Resources

Current

IndustrialMech updates

Hey, just to clarify, you're still working on the IndustrialMech updates, right?--Mbear^(talk) 12:34, 6 January 2015 (PST)

Yes i am, i've been side tracked with IRL work. I'll be working on it tomorrow. -- Wrangler (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2015 (PST)

No problem. I just didn't want to step on your toes if you were still working on them. Thanks! --Mbear^(talk) 04:27, 7 January 2015 (PST)

Other FM 3085/3145 Units

Hi Mbear, I'm still going work on the industrial Mech profiles. I noticed your working on 3085/3145 regiments. I just wanted ask if there were other 3085/3145 regimental units you wanted me to tackle? their fast and easy in comparison to the mech unit ones sometimes. -- Wrangler (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2015 (PST)

Well, if you feel like it, the Marik Protectors as a whole could use some attention. Those are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.--Mbear^(talk) 04:27, 7 January 2015 (PST)

I've just done the Harvester Ant now, there questions left open about how the Inner Sphere got mods original introduced by the Pentagon Powers since they were completely separated and like wiped out. No way they would shared their methods of hot wiring combat systems into a industrial ArgoMech. I'll work on Marik Protectors stuff today -- Wrangler (talk)

I think the Pentagon Power versions of the 'Mechs were just where their record sheets were introduced to the players. There are rules for using Pentagon style refits in Historical: Reunification War, pp 204-205.--Mbear^(talk) 05:07, 7 January 2015 (PST)

I'm tempted contact CGL about if this is considered to be errant or not. They're sometimes harsh in response so i don't want mess stuff up asking. -- Wrangler (talk) 08:11, 7 January 2015 (PST)

Bristol

If you could check this talk page, that'd be great! -BobTheZombie (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2015 (PST)

Battle of Harrow's Sun

W - Was hoping you could give Battle of Harrow's Sun a look. Thanks. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:40, 22 March 2015 (PDT)

Shield Page

I want to personally thank you for working on that shield page and cleaning up the related information. That has been a thorn in my side for quite some time and I'm glad someone stepped in and took care of it. Oh, and here's an award: -BobTheZombie (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2015 (PDT)

Thank you, Bob! I appreciate it. I want help out with what time i have. I'm glad i was able easy one your budden. I'm been trying find stuff i can tackle. Its frustrating sometimes when i feel like I'm in competition to help out! Thank you for the award!

Support Vehicles

Hi Wrangler,
I've done some fiddling with templates before, but I don't know a lot about support vehicles. If you can give me a list of changes/additions that're needed to the support vehicle template, I'm willing to try updating the template. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2015 (PDT)

Thanks to BrokenMnemonic for getting to this. I meant to but it got lost in the shuffle. One question: Should the Equipment and Capacities header read Equipment and Capabilities instead? (I don't understand why it has Capacities in there.)--Mbear^(talk)

Yes, Equipment and Capabilities is how it's suppose to be. I sort of grammar blind at times on certain words, that unfortunately ones of them. Thanks you guys! BrokenMnemonic, that only needed (for the infobox) that's missing is the the fuel information line you find in the Aerospace Fighter template and Equipment list i suggested which is something unique for support vehicles. Example a Naval Support Vehicles lousy way to explain a Aircraft Carrier, it need Helipads, and other items, i'd like to have those listed like the weapons. -- Wrangler (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2015 (PDT)

Hey BrokenMnemonic, another thing you should look into adding is look at previous Support Vehicle articles. I've had to improvise in someone some of them due to limitations and at time editors able edit the infobox at the time. If additional feature could be added to the infobox if within your abilities to do so, can you make it so the line item listed if left blank disappears? This is done in the past for some of the infoboxes, question marks are usually left in place so the line remains so the editor may choose use it or know it's there. Some features in Support Vehicles have space capacities for or the Length of vehicle for example. I can't remember them all, but the older ones had unique features. -- Wrangler (talk) 06:36, 8 May 2015 (PDT)