Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charger"
Sarna News
(eh..) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*I have included some additional info on the CGR-SB variant, including the fact that it is referred to as "Challenger". This information is from the BattleTechnology magazine and thus canonical. However, I could not correctly cite the source of the information because I only have a copy of the page here (April 3028, page 44/45) and not the whole magazine. So if somebody else could fill in the blanks please... [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 04:06, 25 August 2007 (CDT) | *I have included some additional info on the CGR-SB variant, including the fact that it is referred to as "Challenger". This information is from the BattleTechnology magazine and thus canonical. However, I could not correctly cite the source of the information because I only have a copy of the page here (April 3028, page 44/45) and not the whole magazine. So if somebody else could fill in the blanks please... [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 04:06, 25 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Actually, BattleTechnology isn't strictly canon (kind of a gray area; see: http://forums.classicbattletech.com/index.php/topic,5372.0.html), but since the variant in question apparently appeared first in the mag, I'd assume that the info is good. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 11:12, 25 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:12, 25 August 2007
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
- I have included some additional info on the CGR-SB variant, including the fact that it is referred to as "Challenger". This information is from the BattleTechnology magazine and thus canonical. However, I could not correctly cite the source of the information because I only have a copy of the page here (April 3028, page 44/45) and not the whole magazine. So if somebody else could fill in the blanks please... Frabby 04:06, 25 August 2007 (CDT)
- Actually, BattleTechnology isn't strictly canon (kind of a gray area; see: http://forums.classicbattletech.com/index.php/topic,5372.0.html), but since the variant in question apparently appeared first in the mag, I'd assume that the info is good. --Scaletail 11:12, 25 August 2007 (CDT)