Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wrangler"
Sarna News
(→Operation SCOUR: new section) |
(Response on Operation: SCOUR) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Wrangler - I see your point. I was tired of so many red-links popping up, every time an article was updated with info from that part of the Jihad. I would not protest if you decided to delete the stub. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | Wrangler - I see your point. I was tired of so many red-links popping up, every time an article was updated with info from that part of the Jihad. I would not protest if you decided to delete the stub. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Hi ClanWolverine101, it bothers me to have place holder with little no info in it. I make my share of mistakes when i make articles, so i try to cite them as much i can. I think Sarna.net getting bad rap if we keep put near empty articles out verse ones with content. I'll see if i can get myself setup to do real write up on the event. I haven't felt i've fully grasp entire operation, since its so scattered amoung articles. Its still Hot Spots book with holes missing on whats going on. I was hoping to wait for next source book since its suppose have bit more on the war and last years. Take care -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 15:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:29, 14 January 2011
Archives
Resources Pages
Current
Casual Edit the Fourth
Mornin', Wrangler. Thanks for fixing my wlink errors on List of BattleTech products. Here's a Casual Edit ribbon, in appreciation.
--Revanche (talk|contribs) 13:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Rev, it was nothing. Always trying help out. -- Wrangler 12:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Operation SCOUR
Wrangler - I see your point. I was tired of so many red-links popping up, every time an article was updated with info from that part of the Jihad. I would not protest if you decided to delete the stub. ClanWolverine101 14:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi ClanWolverine101, it bothers me to have place holder with little no info in it. I make my share of mistakes when i make articles, so i try to cite them as much i can. I think Sarna.net getting bad rap if we keep put near empty articles out verse ones with content. I'll see if i can get myself setup to do real write up on the event. I haven't felt i've fully grasp entire operation, since its so scattered amoung articles. Its still Hot Spots book with holes missing on whats going on. I was hoping to wait for next source book since its suppose have bit more on the war and last years. Take care -- Wrangler 15:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)