Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mbear/BVWorksheet"

(Not a template?)
m (Response to scaletail.)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
: Heat Sink Rating: the 14 is a made up number I needed for a placeholder. You may've missed it, but Total Armor Points and Total Internal Structure Points have 100 next to them for the same reason.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
: Heat Sink Rating: the 14 is a made up number I needed for a placeholder. You may've missed it, but Total Armor Points and Total Internal Structure Points have 100 next to them for the same reason.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:: I thought the point was to make this a template? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:: I thought the point was to make this a template? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::It is but I need something to work with to make the template. (Personally I find it a lot easier to discuss a proposal like this if I have something concrete to point to and say "look at line 7" or whatever.)
 +
:::And "template" in my mind is like the quickly create a canon mech article option, instead of the stub/user ban template.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 11:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:53, 20 April 2010

Good job so far! However I found some issues:

  • Errata not taken into account. TechManual Errata 2.0
  • Need a disclaimer/mentioning that TO stuff isn't in the worksheet.
  • The HeatSinkRating part is confusing. What is 14?

--Neufeld 16:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

You're right about the errata. This is the first draft based on what I had in front of me. (The Tech Manual).
Will add a disclaimer.
Heat Sink Rating: the 14 is a made up number I needed for a placeholder. You may've missed it, but Total Armor Points and Total Internal Structure Points have 100 next to them for the same reason.--Mbear 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I thought the point was to make this a template? --Scaletail 00:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
It is but I need something to work with to make the template. (Personally I find it a lot easier to discuss a proposal like this if I have something concrete to point to and say "look at line 7" or whatever.)
And "template" in my mind is like the quickly create a canon mech article option, instead of the stub/user ban template.--Mbear 11:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)