Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naval Laser 35"

m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
~David{{Unsigned|Villagereaver}}
 
~David{{Unsigned|Villagereaver}}
 
:Hey Villagereaver, as the wiki is becoming more lore orientated (we realised that rules can get us in trouble with copyright laws) it likely make sense to have them.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 17:46, 2 March 2024 (EST)
 
:Hey Villagereaver, as the wiki is becoming more lore orientated (we realised that rules can get us in trouble with copyright laws) it likely make sense to have them.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 17:46, 2 March 2024 (EST)
 +
 +
I wasn't clear. Capital ranges are in multiple kilometres and not compatible with battlefield ranges. I was asking about listing appropriate ranges, some might even say "lore friendly" ranges. If I were building a several hundred ton space based weapon system, I'd like a range of more than a few metres.

Latest revision as of 12:31, 15 March 2024

Capital Ranges[edit]

Since capital ranges are different than battlefield, should the ranges in metres be removed?

If ranges in metres (km) are desired, I'll happily add them to capital weapons. ~David— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by Villagereaver (talkcontribs) .

Hey Villagereaver, as the wiki is becoming more lore orientated (we realised that rules can get us in trouble with copyright laws) it likely make sense to have them.--Dmon (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2024 (EST)

I wasn't clear. Capital ranges are in multiple kilometres and not compatible with battlefield ranges. I was asking about listing appropriate ranges, some might even say "lore friendly" ranges. If I were building a several hundred ton space based weapon system, I'd like a range of more than a few metres.