Difference between revisions of "Talk:1st McCarron's Armored Cavalry"

(→‎Merging: resp)
(Resp: House unit now.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:Why? Other regiments have also their own page. Would you also propose to merge 10th Lyran Guards into the Lyran Guards main article? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:Why? Other regiments have also their own page. Would you also propose to merge 10th Lyran Guards into the Lyran Guards main article? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:: I addressed this in the main MAC talk page - It is my position that mercenary units should be the exception to the "one regiment, one article" rule. I apply the same to Wolf's Dragoons, the ELH, etc. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:: I addressed this in the main MAC talk page - It is my position that mercenary units should be the exception to the "one regiment, one article" rule. I apply the same to Wolf's Dragoons, the ELH, etc. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 +
::: The MAC is no longer a mercenary unit. It has become a CC house unit. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 14:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:04, 8 April 2010

Merging

Proposing this be merged into the main article for MAC. ClanWolverine101 03:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Why? Other regiments have also their own page. Would you also propose to merge 10th Lyran Guards into the Lyran Guards main article? --Neufeld 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I addressed this in the main MAC talk page - It is my position that mercenary units should be the exception to the "one regiment, one article" rule. I apply the same to Wolf's Dragoons, the ELH, etc. ClanWolverine101 14:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
The MAC is no longer a mercenary unit. It has become a CC house unit. --Neufeld 14:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)