Difference between revisions of "Talk:1st McCarron's Armored Cavalry"
Sarna News
m (punctuation) |
(→Merging: resp) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Proposing this be merged into the main article for MAC. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 03:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | Proposing this be merged into the main article for MAC. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 03:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Why? Other regiments have also their own page. Would you also propose to merge 10th Lyran Guards into the Lyran Guards main article? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | :Why? Other regiments have also their own page. Would you also propose to merge 10th Lyran Guards into the Lyran Guards main article? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: I addressed this in the main MAC talk page - It is my position that mercenary units should be the exception to the "one regiment, one article" rule. I apply the same to Wolf's Dragoons, the ELH, etc. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 8 April 2010
Merging
Proposing this be merged into the main article for MAC. ClanWolverine101 03:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Why? Other regiments have also their own page. Would you also propose to merge 10th Lyran Guards into the Lyran Guards main article? --Neufeld 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- I addressed this in the main MAC talk page - It is my position that mercenary units should be the exception to the "one regiment, one article" rule. I apply the same to Wolf's Dragoons, the ELH, etc. ClanWolverine101 14:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)