Editing User talk:Dmon/Archive 2020
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 135:
Line 135:
== Article Naming for battles == == Article Naming for battles ==
− I noticed that you recently moved several articles for battles to include the year of the engagement. (For example, [[Battle of Wolcott]] to [[Battle of Wolcott (3050)]].) The [[Policy:Article_Naming#Battles|relevant policy]] seems to indicate that the year should be included only when there were multiple battles at the same location. Am I missing something here? I ask because I recently split off a new article for the [[Battle of Huntress (3060)|Battle of Huntress]], and I anticipate working on the [[Battle of Trafalgar]] in the near future, and I want to be consistent with current policy. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:03, 25 July 2020 (EDT) + I noticed that you recently moved several articles for battles to include the year of the engagement. (For example, [[Battle of Wolcott]] to [[Battle of Wolcott (3050)]].) The [[Policy:Article_Naming#Battles|relevant policy]] seems to indicate that the year should be included only when there were multiple battles at the same location. Am I missing something here? I ask because I recently split off a new article for the [[Battle of Huntress]], and I anticipate working on the [[Battle of Trafalgar]] in the near future, and I want to be consistent with current policy. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:03, 25 July 2020 (EDT)
:Hey TD, :Hey TD,
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
== Article Naming for battles == | == Article Naming for battles == | ||
− | I noticed that you recently moved several articles for battles to include the year of the engagement. (For example, [[Battle of Wolcott]] to [[Battle of Wolcott (3050)]].) The [[Policy:Article_Naming#Battles|relevant policy]] seems to indicate that the year should be included only when there were multiple battles at the same location. Am I missing something here? I ask because I recently split off a new article for the [[ | + | I noticed that you recently moved several articles for battles to include the year of the engagement. (For example, [[Battle of Wolcott]] to [[Battle of Wolcott (3050)]].) The [[Policy:Article_Naming#Battles|relevant policy]] seems to indicate that the year should be included only when there were multiple battles at the same location. Am I missing something here? I ask because I recently split off a new article for the [[Battle of Huntress]], and I anticipate working on the [[Battle of Trafalgar]] in the near future, and I want to be consistent with current policy. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:03, 25 July 2020 (EDT) |
:Hey TD, | :Hey TD, | ||