Editing Talk:Javelin
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 13:
Line 13:
::::::It seems to me that '''Fire Javelin''' denotes ''any'' variant of the Javelin that exchanges its characteristic SRMs for lasers. It may originally even have been a slang word that was then adopted by the manufacturers when they created proper variants (as opposed to wild field refits) with such a configuration, i.e. the -10F. The -11D is also a Fire Javelin, by virtue of being a subvariant of the original -10F Fire Javelin. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 03:48, 6 April 2008 (CDT) ::::::It seems to me that '''Fire Javelin''' denotes ''any'' variant of the Javelin that exchanges its characteristic SRMs for lasers. It may originally even have been a slang word that was then adopted by the manufacturers when they created proper variants (as opposed to wild field refits) with such a configuration, i.e. the -10F. The -11D is also a Fire Javelin, by virtue of being a subvariant of the original -10F Fire Javelin. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 03:48, 6 April 2008 (CDT)
:::::::The reason that it needed to be denoted as the "Fire Javelin" was because the -10N is the same designation as the base 3025 variant. Is the -11N designation in [[TRO:3039]]? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 09:47, 6 April 2008 (CDT) :::::::The reason that it needed to be denoted as the "Fire Javelin" was because the -10N is the same designation as the base 3025 variant. Is the -11N designation in [[TRO:3039]]? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 09:47, 6 April 2008 (CDT)
−
− I had found 2 sources, cant find the second source now.....I will try to find another corroborating source.[[User:CJKeys|CJ]] 22:19, 6 April 2008 (CDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::::It seems to me that '''Fire Javelin''' denotes ''any'' variant of the Javelin that exchanges its characteristic SRMs for lasers. It may originally even have been a slang word that was then adopted by the manufacturers when they created proper variants (as opposed to wild field refits) with such a configuration, i.e. the -10F. The -11D is also a Fire Javelin, by virtue of being a subvariant of the original -10F Fire Javelin. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 03:48, 6 April 2008 (CDT) | ::::::It seems to me that '''Fire Javelin''' denotes ''any'' variant of the Javelin that exchanges its characteristic SRMs for lasers. It may originally even have been a slang word that was then adopted by the manufacturers when they created proper variants (as opposed to wild field refits) with such a configuration, i.e. the -10F. The -11D is also a Fire Javelin, by virtue of being a subvariant of the original -10F Fire Javelin. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 03:48, 6 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
:::::::The reason that it needed to be denoted as the "Fire Javelin" was because the -10N is the same designation as the base 3025 variant. Is the -11N designation in [[TRO:3039]]? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 09:47, 6 April 2008 (CDT) | :::::::The reason that it needed to be denoted as the "Fire Javelin" was because the -10N is the same designation as the base 3025 variant. Is the -11N designation in [[TRO:3039]]? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 09:47, 6 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
− | |||
− |