Editing Talk:Danielle Peterson
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 4:
Line 4: :I personally have no problem with the information being in Danielle's profile as it would inevitably be cut down if incorporated into the Awesome article--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:36, 26 July 2017 (EDT) :I personally have no problem with the information being in Danielle's profile as it would inevitably be cut down if incorporated into the Awesome article--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:36, 26 July 2017 (EDT) ::I doubt it would be cut down, since the same description has been on the Awesome page for some time and will likely remain. I'm currently assisting with standardizing BattleMech pages with canon and apocryphal variants from various sources such as games or magazines like BattleTechnology. Otherwise this page would need to be edited with an apocryphal notice for the "BattleMech" section. If you wish, please view the discussion for the standardizing in the [[Commando]] section [[User:Thehawk|Thehawk]] ([[User talk:Thehawk|talk]]) 19:41, 26 July 2017 (EDT) ::I doubt it would be cut down, since the same description has been on the Awesome page for some time and will likely remain. I'm currently assisting with standardizing BattleMech pages with canon and apocryphal variants from various sources such as games or magazines like BattleTechnology. Otherwise this page would need to be edited with an apocryphal notice for the "BattleMech" section. If you wish, please view the discussion for the standardizing in the [[Commando]] section [[User:Thehawk|Thehawk]] ([[User talk:Thehawk|talk]]) 19:41, 26 July 2017 (EDT) − :::Having read that, I see your point and agree with you now.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 20:08, 26 July 2017 (EDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I personally have no problem with the information being in Danielle's profile as it would inevitably be cut down if incorporated into the Awesome article--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:36, 26 July 2017 (EDT) | :I personally have no problem with the information being in Danielle's profile as it would inevitably be cut down if incorporated into the Awesome article--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:36, 26 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
::I doubt it would be cut down, since the same description has been on the Awesome page for some time and will likely remain. I'm currently assisting with standardizing BattleMech pages with canon and apocryphal variants from various sources such as games or magazines like BattleTechnology. Otherwise this page would need to be edited with an apocryphal notice for the "BattleMech" section. If you wish, please view the discussion for the standardizing in the [[Commando]] section [[User:Thehawk|Thehawk]] ([[User talk:Thehawk|talk]]) 19:41, 26 July 2017 (EDT) | ::I doubt it would be cut down, since the same description has been on the Awesome page for some time and will likely remain. I'm currently assisting with standardizing BattleMech pages with canon and apocryphal variants from various sources such as games or magazines like BattleTechnology. Otherwise this page would need to be edited with an apocryphal notice for the "BattleMech" section. If you wish, please view the discussion for the standardizing in the [[Commando]] section [[User:Thehawk|Thehawk]] ([[User talk:Thehawk|talk]]) 19:41, 26 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||