Discussion: Edit

Editing Talk:Chilton (Jump Jets)

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WikiProject Technology|tr=new}}
 
{{WikiProject Technology|tr=new}}
 
Phew... Who would have thunk that such an innocuous item as jump jets would involve so much legwork. This page is meant as a method of establishing a way to clean up the [[Jump Jets]] page. Each main type of Jump Jets could get a page modeled after this one and the type linked to the Jump Jets page in place of the large table there. -- -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 08:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
Phew... Who would have thunk that such an innocuous item as jump jets would involve so much legwork. This page is meant as a method of establishing a way to clean up the [[Jump Jets]] page. Each main type of Jump Jets could get a page modeled after this one and the type linked to the Jump Jets page in place of the large table there. -- -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 08:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
:I think this is a great idea.  I'm glad someone thought of it.  I was thinking I would make an equivalent for the Rawlings jump jets when I unfry my brain.  I do have to wonder about all the pages named chilton x (where is is a number)  Most of them have little in the way of content and if they did it would just duplicate what's here.  Wouldn't it be better to just link straight here to the appropriate subsection and make those pages redirects? --[[User:BirdofPrey|BirdofPrey]], 09:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
+
:I think this is a great idea.  I'm glad someone thought of it.  I was thinking I would make an equivalent for the Rawlings jump jets when I unfry my brain.  I do have to wonder about all the pages named chilton x (where is is a number)  Most of them have little in the way of content and if they did it would just duplicate what's here.  Wouldn't it be better to just link straight here to the appropriate subsection and make those pages redirects? 09:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
::Hy i jump in, i think we need no separated pages with minor conten like chilton x, redirects makes more sense, and we can take a deletion tag on the [[Chilton 460]], [[Chilton 465|465]] ect. pages, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 09:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
::Hy i jump in, i think we need no separated pages with minor conten like chilton x, redirects makes more sense, and we can take a deletion tag on the [[Chilton 460]], [[Chilton 465|465]] ect. pages, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 09:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::I was originally intending for them to be redirects but I could not figure out how to make them work. Alternatively the information about each of the sub models could be moved to those stubs to prevent this page from getting to0 big, bit I think that might be excessive. I mean, really, the particular number attached to the particular name of the jump jet used when there isn't even a named factory for that type of jump jet is about as fluffy of fluff as it gets. ; ) So, I personally think a redirect would be best. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 20:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::I was originally intending for them to be redirects but I could not figure out how to make them work. Alternatively the information about each of the sub models could be moved to those stubs to prevent this page from getting to0 big, bit I think that might be excessive. I mean, really, the particular number attached to the particular name of the jump jet used when there isn't even a named factory for that type of jump jet is about as fluffy of fluff as it gets. ; ) So, I personally think a redirect would be best. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 20:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
::::Holla, i make the redirects in the next days, i bump out in this time the reference mess, on the [[Jump Jet]] page, and make some copyedits, on linked pages.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 20:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
::::Holla, i make the redirects in the next days, i bump out in this time the reference mess, on the [[Jump Jet]] page, and make some copyedits, on linked pages.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 20:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::::Cool. I've filled in the page with all the Chiltons I could find and split the page up into regular jump jets and improved jump jets. This format will probably work for the rest of the JJ's and other components for that matter. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 22:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::::Cool. I've filled in the page with all the Chiltons I could find and split the page up into regular jump jets and improved jump jets. This format will probably work for the rest of the JJ's and other components for that matter. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 22:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to BattleTechWiki are considered to be released under the GNU FDL 1.2 (see BattleTechWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Advanced templates:

Editing: {{Merge}}   {{Moratorium}}   {{Otheruses| | | }}

Notices: {{NoEdit}}   {{Sign}}   {{Unsigned|name}}   {{Welcome}}

Administration: {{Essay}}   {{Policy}}   {{Procedure}}